how about they focus on their browser and work on developing ethical toolsets that destroy the need for something like chatgpt (gross)

For me i suppose using a platform such as a microblogging site or something akin to discord (fuck discord tho) has proved productive to find new people whom i can connect with and hold informative and intimate, rather long-form conversations with.

This is literally my worst nightmare

And yet it would make already difficult conversations even more so and open a door for horrible emotional and other forms of psychological abuse.

it's got a lot of regular security flaws from what ive seen from a quick search. But I'll consider it. Thanks!

I really enjoy calckey's UI and havent found any client that supports groups either

yes, weird how microblogging is being damned through..a micro-blog post.

Would love to read a blog!

Agreed! Microblogging is great to explore diverse people, but any critical yet constructive conversation needs a structure


🚨 ActivityPub Client and C2S Support

If you read that and you have any influence in the development of Fediverse projects please make sure the CORS headers for the following endpoints are set to *.

  • /.well-known/webfinger (needed to fetch account information)
  • /.well-known/nodeinfo (needed to get information what sofware the instance runs)
  • The outbox endpoint to get posts and all referenced endpoints to be able to access public content from web

/cc @fediforum @fediverse @fediversenews

Inaccessible reply

Very odd indeed

Worth it

Venezuela, China, Biden and extraterrestrials: the disinformation of AI becomes widespread

Venezuela, China, Biden and extraterrestrials: the disinformation of AI becomes widespread (

big Bruh moment

and yet they released it. Anyone who still entertains this propaganda device while being aware of all of this is completely off my circle.

I mean to call ChatGPT a potential propaganda device given its blatant inclination towards disinformation. With its copycats like that of Bing actively trying to gaslight its users too.

probably not, but is a very powerful weapon for it

I would like an elaboration on your first sentence. Genuine curiousity, i want to understand your point.

I do understand what you mean. My instintive reaction to the proposition that it doesnt matter of the quantity of the disinformation is to disagree. But i do not have warranted argument against it nor the health to study it currently. Do pardon me for breaking the conversation here, I appreciate the good faith nature of it.